Stylistic Details*
I. Bibliography
Please, list the bibliography which are cited in your work, at the end of the paper.
for Books
Çüçen, A. K. (2000) Heidegger’de Varlık ve Zaman, Bursa: Asa Kitabevi.
Goldman, A. I. (1999) Knowledge in a Social World, New York: Clarendon Press.
Eagleton, T. (2004) Kuramdan Sonra, trans. Uygar Abacı, İstanbul: Literatür Yayınları.
for the cited articles published individually in a magazin
Keskin, F. (2005) “Çağdaş Marksizmde Adalet Tartışmaları,” Felsefe Tartışmaları, edit. nr: 34, p. 1-27.
Gettier, E. (1963) “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”, Analysis, nr: 23, s. 121-123.
for the articles in books which consist of collective works
Fine, A. (1996) “The Natural Ontological Attitude,” in The Philosophy of Science, ed. D. Papineau, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Should any of the authors with more than one work published in the same year, be mentioned in the bibliography, edition year of different works must be shown as follows: Quine (1972a), Quine (1972b, p. 71).
Footnotes, excluding the main text, may be used in order to point out some related ideas and they are to be noted as short as possible. (These notes should be placed at the end of the page to which they belong. They should not be listed all together or at the end of the manuscript.) However, the references to the works in bibliography should be indicated within the main text in brackets. The references within the main text, should be indicated according to the formal structure and be adjusted to one of the relevant reference style, as shown below.
Notably, A. White (1976), R. Stone (1988) ve B. Wood (1996) came up with important ideas on this issue. According to White, when establishing a metaphysical theory is in question, it is impossible to exclude entirely the Kantian idea of noumenon (1976, s. 53). Certainly, there are opposers of this idea, as well as many supporters of it which can not be underestimated. It is possible to sum up the common ground of the opposers as follows: “Noumena, in principle, accepted as something which can not be cognized or speculated over, becomes an unattractive topic as much as philosophical inquiry is concerned.” (Burns 2003a, s.194)
II. Other details and reminders
1. All emphasis should only be made with italic characters instead of underlied or bold.
2. Please, abide following rules for your paper to comply with the format: (1) There should not be any space between a word and punctuation following that word. (2) Except of the full stop at the end of a sentence, there should be single space between a punctuation and the word following it. (3) When begining with a new sentence, after the full stop at the end of previous sentence, there should be a double space instead of single. (Here is an example for incorrect usage: In this and the following line you are reading now ,the punctuation is used incorrectly . In other words,spacing is done in a wrong way.)
3. At the final stage of overviewing the manuscript, it is advised to have a recourse on the Spelling Guidelines provided on the web site of the Turkish Language Association.
The manuscripts submitted to our magazine for the referee consideration are prefered to comply with the rules specifed under I and II. It is compulsory for the authors whose papers are accepted to be published, to review their manuscripts and display the conditions on it precisely according to the specified rules. Editorial board reserves the right to not to publish the paper if the formal conditions are not applied or corrected within the specified period of time. Please note that, it is the authors’ responsibility to make sure that the citations are not false claims but literally truthful. Philosophical ideas brought forward in the papers are considered to be author’s personal opinion.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The stylistic guidelines specified here are taken from Felsefe Tartismalari, a Turkish philosophy journal.
